Quadro M5000M vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	112	362
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.13	no data
Power efficiency	12.72	13.03
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	GV100	GM204
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	18 August 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	1,536
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1051 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	93.60
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	2.995 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	320	96
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	576 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	160 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	7.0	5.2
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.11
+144%

M5000M 16.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+144%

Samples: 142

M5000M 7014
Samples: 261

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 167528
+632%

M5000M 22889

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

TITAN V 153221
+516%

M5000M 24875

GeekBench 5 CUDA

TITAN V 179522
+786%

M5000M 20269

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	200−210 +138%	84 −138%
1440p	152 +153%	60−65 −153%
4K	82 +173%	30−35 −173%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	15.00	no data
1440p	19.73	no data
4K	36.57	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Palworld	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Fortnite	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Palworld	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Fortnite	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Palworld	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	67 +0%	67 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 +0%	38 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Palworld	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Palworld	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Palworld	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Palworld	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how TITAN V and M5000M compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 138% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 153% faster in 1440p
TITAN V is 173% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.11	16.84
Recency	7 December 2017	18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt

TITAN V has a 144% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

M5000M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation one.