GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
41.02

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms TITAN V by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.14no data
Power efficiency12.7531.48
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV100AD106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204608
Core clock speed1200 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6244.1
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs320144
Tensor Cores640144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache7.5 MB4.5 MB
L2 Cache4.5 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.08.9
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.02
RTX 4070 Mobile 46.61
+13.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
Samples: 152
RTX 4070 Mobile 19460
+13.6%
Samples: 13675

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110124
+24%
1440p152
+117%
70
4K82
+90.7%
43

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.99no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 188 188
Counter-Strike 2 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 135 135
Resident Evil 4 Remake 160 160

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 140 140
Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 172 172
Cyberpunk 2077 115 115
Far Cry 5 139 139
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 95 95
Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 146 146
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 97 97
Dota 2 178 178
Far Cry 5 133 133
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 144 144
Metro Exodus 111 111
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 229 229
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 87 87
Dota 2 167 167
Far Cry 5 123 123
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 116
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 94 94
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 90 90
Metro Exodus 69 69
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 54 54
Far Cry 5 112 112
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89 89

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130 120−130

4K
High

Atomic Heart 35−40 35−40
Counter-Strike 2 43 43
Grand Theft Auto V 90 90
Metro Exodus 44 44
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 71
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 24 24
Dota 2 146 146
Far Cry 5 61 61
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 70−75

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

This is how TITAN V and RTX 4070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 24% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 117% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 91% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.02 46.61
Recency 7 December 2017 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

TITAN V has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 58% more advanced lithography process, and 54% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the TITAN V in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3356 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2714 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.