GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
41.11
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
41.42
+0.7%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms TITAN V by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.14no data
Power efficiency12.7427.91
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGV100GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51205632
Core clock speed1200 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6248.2
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS15.88 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs320176
Tensor Cores640176
Ray Tracing Coresno data44
L1 Cache7.5 MB5.5 MB
L2 Cache4.5 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.08.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.11
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 41.42
+0.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
Samples: 152
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 17256
+0.8%
Samples: 4786

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
−6.8%
118
+6.8%
1440p152
+52.6%
72
−52.6%
4K82
+41.5%
48
−41.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p27.26no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 158
+0%
158
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
+0%
111
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 95
+0%
95
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 111% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 71% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.11 41.42
Recency 7 December 2017 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

TITAN V has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 54% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN V and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3356 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1103 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.