GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh vs TITAN V
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 112 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.13 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.72 | no data |
| Architecture | Volta (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GV100 | TU106B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 December 2017 (8 years ago) | 29 January 2019 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,100 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 465.6 | 144.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 14.9 TFLOPS | 4.608 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 48 |
| TMUs | 320 | 120 |
| Tensor Cores | 640 | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 30 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 3072 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 848 MHz | 1353 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 651.3 GB/s | 259.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 December 2017 | 29 January 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
TITAN V has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 117% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between TITAN V and GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
