GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition Xavier
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
950A 950M 950M Mac Edition 960A 960M 965M 965M 4 GB 965M SLI 970M 970M SLI 980 Mobile 980 SLI Mobile 980M 980M SLI 980MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce GTX 980M SLI, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017, $2,999
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
41.11
+73.8%

TITAN V outperforms 980M SLI by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN V TITAN V
GTX 980M SLI GTX 980M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.14no data
Power efficiency12.739.16
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGV100no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (8 years ago)7 October 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203072
Core clock speed1200 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1127 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million2x 5200 Million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6no data
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs320no data
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache7.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4.5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2x 8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan++
CUDA7.0+
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p230−240
+70.4%
135
−70.4%
Full HD190−200
+72.7%
110
−72.7%
1440p152
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
4K82
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.78no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how TITAN V and GTX 980M SLI compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 70% faster in 900p
  • TITAN V is 73% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 79% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 82% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 41.11 23.66
Recency 7 December 2017 7 October 2014
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

TITAN V has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 980M SLI, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
R9 M380 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
vs
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
ATI HD 3450 X2 Radeon HD 3450 X2
vs
RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5080
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
vs
RX 570 X2 Radeon RX 570 X2
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Tesla M2050 Tesla M2050
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3352 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or GeForce GTX 980M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.