GeForce GTX 780 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	112	326
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.13	4.25
Power efficiency	12.72	5.92
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GV100	GK110
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	23 May 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 780 has 3% better value for money than TITAN V.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2304
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	863 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	465.6	173.2
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	4.156 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	48
TMUs	320	192
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	192 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Minimum recommended system power	no data	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	3 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
PhysX	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.175
CUDA	7.0	+
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.11
+115%

GTX 780 19.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+115%

Samples: 142

GTX 780 7972
Samples: 8889

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 167528
+619%

GTX 780 23314

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

TITAN V 153221
+525%

GTX 780 24514

GeekBench 5 CUDA

TITAN V 179522
+895%

GTX 780 18049

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +104%	54 −104%
1440p	152 +117%	70−75 −117%
4K	82 +134%	35−40 −134%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	27.26 −127%	12.02 +127%
1440p	19.73 −113%	9.27 +113%
4K	36.57 −97.2%	18.54 +97.2%

GTX 780 has 127% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 780 has 113% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 780 has 97% lower cost per frame in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.11	19.14
Recency	7 December 2017	23 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	3 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm

TITAN V has a 115% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 in performance tests.