GeForce GTX 670 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	112	435
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.13	3.14
Power efficiency	12.72	5.87
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GV100	GK104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	10 May 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

TITAN V has 32% better value for money than GTX 670.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	1344
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	980 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	97 °C
Texture fill rate	465.6	109.8
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	2.634 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	32
TMUs	320	112
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	112 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	7.0	+
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.11
+219%

GTX 670 12.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+219%

Samples: 142

GTX 670 5373
Samples: 9752

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 167528
+992%

GTX 670 15343

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

TITAN V 153221
+884%

GTX 670 15569

GeekBench 5 CUDA

TITAN V 179522
+1446%

GTX 670 11611

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p	152 +238%	45−50 −238%
4K	82 +242%	24−27 −242%

Cost per frame, $

1440p	19.73 −123%	8.87 +123%
4K	36.57 −120%	16.63 +120%

GTX 670 has 123% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 670 has 120% lower cost per frame in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.11	12.90
Recency	7 December 2017	10 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	170 Watt

TITAN V has a 219% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 670, on the other hand, has 47% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670 in performance tests.