Radeon RX 7600 XT vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX and Radeon RX 7600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN RTX
2018, $2,499
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
45.07
+8.7%

TITAN RTX outperforms 7600 XT by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.6976.29
Power efficiency12.5417.00
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7600 XT has 1241% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46082048
Core clock speed1350 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistors18.6 billion13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8352.6
Floating-point processing powerno data22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288128
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores7232
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache4.5 MB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm204 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.96.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 45.07
+8.7%
RX 7600 XT 41.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+8.7%
Samples: 284
RX 7600 XT 17348
Samples: 2287

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD161
+15%
140−150
1440p10290−95
−11.8%
4K73
+12.3%
65−70

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.522.35
+84.9%
1440p24.503.66
+85.1%
4K34.235.06
+85.2%
  • RX 7600 XT has 85% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7600 XT has 85% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7600 XT has 85% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 264
+10%
240−250
Counter-Strike 2 353
+17.7%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+12.9%
70−75
Resident Evil 4 Remake 202
+12.2%
180−190

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 198
+10%
180−190
Battlefield 5 163
+16.4%
140−150
Counter-Strike 2 342
+14%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+12.9%
70−75
Far Cry 5 165
+10%
150−160
Fortnite 169
+12.7%
150−160
Forza Horizon 4 187
+10%
170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+12.2%
180−190
Valorant 348
+16%
300−310

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 118
+18%
100−105
Battlefield 5 164
+9.3%
150−160
Counter-Strike 2 270
+12.5%
240−250
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+11.2%
250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+12.9%
70−75
Dota 2 155
+10.7%
140−150
Far Cry 5 156
+11.4%
140−150
Fortnite 176
+10%
160−170
Forza Horizon 4 186
+9.4%
170−180
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+16.9%
130−140
Metro Exodus 134
+11.7%
120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163
+16.4%
140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+11.3%
240−250
Valorant 336
+12%
300−310

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160
+14.3%
140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+11.4%
70−75
Dota 2 148
+13.8%
130−140
Far Cry 5 146
+12.3%
130−140
Forza Horizon 4 175
+9.4%
160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136
+13.3%
120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+15.8%
120−130
Valorant 236
+12.4%
210−220

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 134
+11.7%
120−130

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 157
+12.1%
140−150
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+12.1%
290−300
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+14%
100−105
Metro Exodus 85
+13.3%
75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+9.4%
160−170
Valorant 307
+9.6%
280−290

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+13%
100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+10%
60−65
Far Cry 5 134
+11.7%
120−130
Forza Horizon 4 157
+12.1%
140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+10.6%
85−90

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+12.7%
110−120

4K
High

Atomic Heart 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
Counter-Strike 2 45
+12.5%
40−45
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+11.7%
120−130
Metro Exodus 55
+10%
50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+14.4%
90−95
Valorant 300
+11.1%
270−280

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 97
+14.1%
85−90
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+12%
50−55
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+10%
30−33
Dota 2 146
+12.3%
130−140
Far Cry 5 80
+14.3%
70−75
Forza Horizon 4 114
+14%
100−105
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+12.9%
85−90

4K
Epic

Fortnite 74
+13.8%
65−70

This is how TITAN RTX and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 15% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 13% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 12% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.07 41.47
Recency 18 December 2018 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 190 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 32% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN RTX and Radeon RX 7600 XT.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 881 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1664 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or Radeon RX 7600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.