Arc Pro B70 vs TITAN RTX

Place in the ranking	93	91
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.85	27.56
Power efficiency	12.51	15.28
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code name	TU102	BMG-G31
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 December 2018 (7 years ago)	26 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$949

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B70 has 371% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	4096
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2800 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	716.8
Floating-point processing power	16.31 TFLOPS	22.94 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	128
TMUs	288	256
Tensor Cores	576	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	32
L1 Cache	4.5 MB	no data
L2 Cache	6 MB	16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	608.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4
CUDA	7.5	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 45.27

Arc Pro B70 45.44
+0.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
Samples: 282

Arc Pro B70 18932
+0.4%

Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	161 +0.6%	160−170 −0.6%
1440p	102 +2%	100−110 −2%
4K	73 +4.3%	70−75 −4.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	15.52 −162%	5.93 +162%
1440p	24.50 −158%	9.49 +158%
4K	34.23 −153%	13.56 +153%

Arc Pro B70 has 162% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc Pro B70 has 158% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Arc Pro B70 has 153% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	353 +0.9%	350−400 −0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Palworld	147 +5%	140−150 −5%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	202 +1%	200−210 −1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	163 +1.9%	160−170 −1.9%
Counter-Strike 2	342 +14%	300−310 −14%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Far Cry 5	165 +3.1%	160−170 −3.1%
Fortnite	169 +5.6%	160−170 −5.6%
Forza Horizon 4	187 +3.9%	180−190 −3.9%
Palworld	124 +3.3%	120−130 −3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	202 +1%	200−210 −1%
Valorant	348 +16%	300−310 −16%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	164 +2.5%	160−170 −2.5%
Counter-Strike 2	270 +0%	270−280 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +3%	270−280 −3%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Dota 2	155 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	156 +4%	150−160 −4%
Fortnite	176 +3.5%	170−180 −3.5%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +3.3%	180−190 −3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	152 +1.3%	150−160 −1.3%
Metro Exodus	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Palworld	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	163 +1.9%	160−170 −1.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	267 +2.7%	260−270 −2.7%
Valorant	336 +12%	300−310 −12%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	160 +0%	160−170 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Dota 2	148 +5.7%	140−150 −5.7%
Far Cry 5	146 +4.3%	140−150 −4.3%
Forza Horizon 4	175 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	136 +4.6%	130−140 −4.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 +6.9%	130−140 −6.9%
Valorant	236 +2.6%	230−240 −2.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Palworld	91 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	157 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	300−350 +8.3%	300−310 −8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	114 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%
Metro Exodus	85 +0%	85−90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Valorant	307 +2.3%	300−310 −2.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120 +2.7%	110−120 −2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Far Cry 5	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	157 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +4.4%	90−95 −4.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	120−130 +3.3%	120−130 −3.3%
Palworld	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	45 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Metro Exodus	55 +0%	55−60 +0%
Palworld	71 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +3%	100−105 −3%
Valorant	300 +0%	300−310 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +10%	30−33 −10%
Dota 2	146 +4.3%	140−150 −4.3%
Far Cry 5	80 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	96 +1.1%	95−100 −1.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	74 +5.7%	70−75 −5.7%
Palworld	36 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%

This is how TITAN RTX and Arc Pro B70 compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 1% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 2% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	45.27	45.44
Recency	18 December 2018	26 March 2026
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	230 Watt

Arc Pro B70 has a 0% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 22% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN RTX and Arc Pro B70.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B70 is a workstation one.