Radeon RX 470 Mobile vs T1200 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared T1200 Mobile with Radeon RX 470 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T1200 Mobile outperforms 470 Mobile by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 337 | 373 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.80 |
| Power efficiency | 15.27 | 15.18 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | Ellesmere |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (5 years ago) | 4 August 2016 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1074 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP) | 85 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 137.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 4.399 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 128 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | no data | MXM-B (3.0) |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 59
+18%
| 50−55 |
| 1440p | 33
+22.2%
| 27−30 |
| 4K | 90
+12.5%
| 80−85 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 11.00 |
| 1440p | no data | 20.37 |
| 4K | no data | 6.87 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+13.8%
|
90−95 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+15.6%
|
30−35 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 40−45
+13.5%
|
35−40 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+9.7%
|
70−75 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+13.8%
|
90−95 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40 |
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+16.1%
|
55−60 |
| Fortnite | 100−110
+9.8%
|
90−95 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+10%
|
70−75 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+15.6%
|
30−35 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+15.9%
|
60−65 |
| Valorant | 140−150
+7.6%
|
130−140 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+9.7%
|
70−75 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+13.8%
|
90−95 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 230−240
+7%
|
210−220 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40 |
| Dota 2 | 114
+12.9%
|
100−110 |
| Far Cry 5 | 59
+5.4%
|
55−60 |
| Fortnite | 100−110
+9.8%
|
90−95 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+10%
|
70−75 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
+12.7%
|
60−65 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+15.6%
|
30−35 |
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+15.9%
|
60−65 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 71
+54.3%
|
45−50 |
| Valorant | 140−150
+7.6%
|
130−140 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+9.7%
|
70−75 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+13.9%
|
35−40 |
| Dota 2 | 107
+5.9%
|
100−110 |
| Far Cry 5 | 56 | 55−60 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+10%
|
70−75 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+15.6%
|
30−35 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+15.9%
|
60−65 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37 | 45−50
+24.3%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+7.6%
|
130−140 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 100−110
+9.8%
|
90−95 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+14.7%
|
30−35 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+11.3%
|
120−130 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
+32.1%
|
27−30 |
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+8.4%
|
150−160 |
| Valorant | 160−170
+8.6%
|
150−160 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+12.5%
|
45−50 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16 |
| Far Cry 5 | 41
+7.9%
|
35−40 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+14.3%
|
40−45 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+16%
|
24−27 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+15.8%
|
35−40 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+9.7%
|
30−35 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27 |
| Valorant | 100−105
+16.3%
|
85−90 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+16%
|
24−27 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7 |
| Dota 2 | 109
+81.7%
|
60−65 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+10.5%
|
18−20 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+13.8%
|
27−30 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+11.8%
|
16−18 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18 |
This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 470 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile is 18% faster in 1080p
- T1200 Mobile is 22% faster in 1440p
- T1200 Mobile is 13% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 82% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 24% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile performs better in 63 tests (97%)
- RX 470 Mobile performs better in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.65 | 16.59 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 4 August 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 85 Watt |
T1200 Mobile has a 12% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.
RX 470 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 11% lower power consumption.
The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
