Radeon PRO W7400 vs Rubin Ultra GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRubin Ultra (2027)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGR110Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20273 August 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores573441792
Core clock speed700 MHz330 MHz
Boost clock speed2267 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors670,000 million13.3 billion
Manufacturing process technology3 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)3600 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate4,062.5123.2
Floating-point processing power260 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2464
TMUs1792112
Tensor Cores1792no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache112 MB512 KB
L2 Cache128 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 6.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthSXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM4eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1024 GB8 GB
Memory bus width32768 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1900 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth31.1 TB/s172.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.9
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA10.7-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1024 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3600 Watt 55 Watt

Rubin Ultra GPU has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

PRO W7400, on the other hand, has 6445% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Rubin Ultra GPU and Radeon PRO W7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rubin Ultra GPU or Radeon PRO W7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.