Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU vs Rubin Ultra GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRubin Ultra (2027)no data
GPU code nameGR110no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20275 March 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5734420
Core clock speed700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2267 MHzno data
Number of transistors670,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology3 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)3600 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate4,062.5no data
Floating-point processing power260 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs1792no data
Tensor Cores1792no data
L1 Cache112 MBno data
L2 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 6.0 x16no data
WidthSXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM4eno data
Maximum RAM amount1024 GBno data
Memory bus width32768 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth31.1 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/Ano data
Shader ModelN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCL3.0no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA10.7-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 3600 Watt 8 Watt

Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Rubin Ultra GPU and M5 Pro 20-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation graphics card while Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate M5 Pro 20-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rubin Ultra GPU or M5 Pro 20-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.