Arc Graphics 2 Xe vs Rubin GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRubin (2026−2027)Xe3-LPG (2026−2027)
GPU code nameGR100Nova Lake-S
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2026 (recently)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28672256
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2267 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors336,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology3 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate2,031.236.80
Floating-point processing power130 TFLOPSno data
ROPs248
TMUs89616
Tensor Cores896no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L1 Cache56 MB128 KB
L2 Cache128 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 6.0 x16IGP
WidthSXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount288 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width16384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2695 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.1 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.9
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA10.7-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 2300 Watt 25 Watt

Arc Graphics 2 Xe has 99% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Rubin GPU and Arc Graphics 2 Xe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rubin GPU is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 2 Xe is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 242 votes

Rate Rubin GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 2 Xe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rubin GPU or Arc Graphics 2 Xe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.