Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Rage 128 VR AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.53
Power efficiencyno data6.38
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRage 4Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 1998 (28 years ago)2 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed80 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors8 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1634.62
Floating-point processing powerno data1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs232
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed125 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1998 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 14 nm

Pro WX 3200 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage 128 VR AGP and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage 128 VR AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Rage 128 VR AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 112 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage 128 VR AGP or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.