ATI All-In-Wonder 128 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1552not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameRS485Rage 4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2006 (20 years ago)16 June 1999 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed400 MHz90 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm250 nm
Texture fill rate0.80.36
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared90 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data720.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.06.0
OpenGL2.01.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2006 16 June 1999
Chip lithography 110 nm 250 nm

ATI Xpress 1150 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 127% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1150 and All-In-Wonder 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1150 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 128 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 60 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1150 or All-In-Wonder 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.