GeForce 210 PCI vs ATI Radeon X850 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1474not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.21no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR480GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed520 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors160 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate8.3203.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed540 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth34.56 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 31 Watt

210 PCI has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 123% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X850 XT and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon X850 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 86 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X850 XT or GeForce 210 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.