FireStream 9250 vs ATI Radeon X800 XL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X800 XL with FireStream 9250, including specs and performance data.

ATI X800 XL
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 49 Watt
0.17

FireStream 9250 outperforms X800 XL by a whopping 1541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1494854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.271.44
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameR430RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)16 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed400 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors160 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate6.40025.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1640
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed490 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth31.36 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI X800 XL 0.17
FireStream 9250 2.79
+1541%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X800 XL 69
Samples: 11
FireStream 9250 1164
+1587%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 2.79
Recency 1 December 2004 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 150 Watt

ATI X800 XL has 206% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9250, on the other hand, has a 1541% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The FireStream 9250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 XL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X800 XL is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 XL or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.