GMA X3000 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameR423Broadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 December 2007 (18 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8004.000
ROPs121
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 December 2007 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 13 Watt

ATI X800 GTO has an age advantage of 1 year.

GMA X3000, on the other hand, has a 44% more advanced lithography process, and 277% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GTO and GMA X3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop graphics card while GMA X3000 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 32 votes

Rate GMA X3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 GTO or GMA X3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.