GMA 3000 vs ATI Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameR423Broadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 October 2005 (20 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0001.600
ROPs164
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2005 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm

GMA 3000 has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 44% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3000 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 47 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X800 CrossFire Edition or GMA 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.