Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs ATI Radeon X600 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1523not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.26no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)no data
GPU code nameRV370no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed325 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)36 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.300no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data
L2 Cacheno data384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 6 January 2025

Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 20 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X600 SE and Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X600 SE is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon X600 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X600 SE or Graphics 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.