Iris Plus Graphics G4 vs ATI Radeon X600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1496not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.34no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV380Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)29 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors75 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)36 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60025.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 36 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X600 PRO and Iris Plus Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 14 votes

Rate Radeon X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X600 PRO or Iris Plus Graphics G4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.