Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.25
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV535Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 November 2007 (18 years ago)7 October 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed587 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors330 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.34850.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs46
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed695 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.24 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 November 2007 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 471% more advanced lithography process, and 193% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1700 FSC and Iris Plus Graphics 645. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1700 FSC is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1700 FSC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 125 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1700 FSC or Iris Plus Graphics 645, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.