ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.45no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV530RV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2007 (18 years ago)2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors157 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0001.600
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed390 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth12.48 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VHDCI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 32 Watt

ATI 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 has a 64% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 PRO and FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 133 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1600 PRO or FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.