Tesla C1080 vs ATI Radeon X1050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.39no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV370GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2006 (19 years ago)9 April 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed400 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors107 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60048.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2006 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 188 Watt

ATI X1050 has 683% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1080, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1050 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1050 or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.