Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.96no data
Power efficiency7.83no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameVega 10GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409657344
Core clock speed1382 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate409.64,062.5
Floating-point processing power13.11 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs2561792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache1 MB112 MB
L2 Cache4 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 3600 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition has 1100% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 29 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.