HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon Vega 9 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.41
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code namePicassoBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57696
Core clock speed300 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate46.807.200
Floating-point processing power1.498 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs3612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 1 April 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 9 Mobile and HD Graphics 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 9 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 459 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 9 Mobile or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.