Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Radeon Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 320SP Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile Vega 7
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Moore Threads MTT S10 Moore Threads MTT S30 Moore Threads MTT S50 Moore Threads MTT S60 Moore Threads MTT S70 Moore Threads MTT S80

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega 7 with Moore Threads MTT S80, including specs and performance data.

Vega 7
2021
45 Watt
6.72
+14.7%

Vega 7 outperforms Moore Threads MTT S80 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Vega 7 Vega 7
Moore Threads MTT S80

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking618659
Place by popularity19not in top-100
Power efficiency11.541.78
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)MUSA 2nd Gen (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCezanneChunxiao
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 April 2021 (5 years ago)11 November 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4484096
Core clock speed300 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million22.0 billion
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20460.8
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8256
TMUs28256
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
1440p28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
4K18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20
+25%
16−18
−25%
Fortnite 63
+26%
50−55
−26%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Valorant 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Fortnite 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Valorant 73
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 25
+19%
21−24
−19%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Valorant 48
+20%
40−45
−20%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 25
+19%
21−24
−19%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how Vega 7 and Moore Threads MTT S80 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 22% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 17% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.72 5.86
Recency 13 April 2021 11 November 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 255 Watt

Vega 7 has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and 467% lower power consumption.

Moore Threads MTT S80, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Moore Threads MTT S80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S80 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GTX 770M GeForce GTX 770M
Moore Threads MTT S80
vs
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
CMP 70HX NVIDIA CMP 70HX
vs
Tesla T40 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
RTX A2000 NVIDIA RTX A2000
vs
Arc Pro B65 Pro B65
CMP 170HX NVIDIA CMP 170HX
vs
A100 PCIe 40 GB PCIe 40 GB
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
Vega 7 AMD Radeon Vega 7
vs
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX 2060 12 GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
Tesla M40 24 GB NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
RX 7900 XT AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 830 Adreno 830
ATI Mobility 7000 ATI Mobility Radeon 7000
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
A2 NVIDIA A2
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 3476 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.