GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Radeon Vega 3 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated128
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.25
Power efficiencyno data17.47
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePicasso-MTU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2019 (7 years ago)9 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922176
Core clock speed300 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40224.4
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs12136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cacheno data2.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 175 Watt

Vega 3 Embedded has 1650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 3 Embedded and GeForce RTX 2060 Super. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 108 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 16040 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 3 Embedded or GeForce RTX 2060 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.