Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Picasso RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11 Efficient RX Vega 56 RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64 Liquid RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega M RX Vega XTX Vega 3 Efficient Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Embedded
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M
2018
15 Watt
15.74
+121%

M outperforms Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M RX Vega M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency81.1819.64
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVegaTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51280
Core clock speed720 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+94.4%
18
−94.4%
1440p18−20
+100%
9
−100%
4K30−35
+114%
14
−114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Palworld 16
+0%
16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how RX Vega M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M is 94% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M is 100% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M is 114% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.74 7.11
Recency 1 February 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

RX Vega M has a 121% higher aggregate performance score, and 87% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M Radeon RX Vega M
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
RX Vega M Radeon RX Vega M
vs
RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile RTX 5080 Mobile
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 5090 DD RTX 5090 DD
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
RX 6500 XT 6500 XT
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
2270 PCIe x1 2270 PCIe x1
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 DDR4
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 Iris Plus Graphics 645
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX 5800 XT RX 5800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1179 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.