GeForce RTX 5070 GB203 vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking383not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency81.35no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVegaGB203
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)31 August 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126144
Core clock speed720 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2512 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million45.6 billion
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08482.3
ROPs880
TMUs32192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 31 August 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega M has 94% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 GB203, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce RTX 5070 GB203. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 GB203 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or GeForce RTX 5070 GB203, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.