GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency81.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaC79
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)18 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216
Core clock speed720 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,500 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate38.083.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 167% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.