Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.45

P3200 outperforms M GL by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.2521.07
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed931 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1543 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88172.8
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112
L1 Cache320 KB672 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.45
Quadro P3200 20.43
+116%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3936
Samples: 338
Quadro P3200 8511
+116%
Samples: 597

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−140%
84
+140%
4K12−14
−133%
28
+133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−87.7%
100−110
+87.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−67.4%
240−250
+67.4%
Dota 2 65−70
−72.5%
119
+72.5%
Fortnite 55−60
−87.7%
100−110
+87.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−117%
75−80
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−250%
84
+250%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−62.3%
112
+62.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−91.7%
46
+91.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−87.7%
100−110
+87.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−155%
28
+155%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−103%
70−75
+103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 140% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 performs better in 17 tests (26%)
  • there's a draw in 48 tests (74%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.45 20.43
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 15% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 116% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
Tesla P6 Tesla P6
vs
M5000 SE M5000 SE
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Xavier Xavier
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
A100 SXM4 A100 SXM4
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 4070 Ti SUPER
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
RX 580 XTR 580 XTR
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
R7 240 OEM R7 240 OEM
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
vs
RX 5500M RX 5500M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 351 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro P3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.