N1 16SM vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code namePolaris 22GB20B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Core clock speed931 MHz741 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2346 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate80.88300.3
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS9.609 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs80128
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache320 KB2 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s273.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 1 June 2026
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

N1 16SM has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and N1 16SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1 16SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or N1 16SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.