GeForce 9600 GTX vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking516not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 22G92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)27 May 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed931 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8827.84
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS0.2784 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8048
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s44.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 27 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

RX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 115% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce 9600 GTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9600 GTX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or GeForce 9600 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.