RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Embedded vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking380not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code namePolaris 22GB203
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153610496
Core clock speed1063 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2570.7
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS36.53 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs96328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cache384 KB10.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Embedded has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.