GeForce GT 710 PCI vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 22GF119
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)2 April 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153648
Core clock speed1063 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate114.26.480
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs968
L1 Cache384 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz667 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s10.67 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 29 Watt

RX Vega M GH has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

GT 710 PCI, on the other hand, has 245% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GT 710 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 710 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 75 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or GeForce GT 710 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.