Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking571not rated
Place by popularity41not in top-100
Power efficiency42.55no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameVegaNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)8 August 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speedno data330 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13.3 billion
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data123.2
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data172.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.9
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 73% lower power consumption.

RX 7400 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon RX 7400 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1787 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 7400 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Radeon RX 7400 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.