GMA vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5641624
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Power efficiency42.86no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameVegaCloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)4 May 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data1.066
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno dataES 2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22no data
1440p16no data
4K10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 24 no data
Counter-Strike 2 63 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18 no data

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 19 no data
Battlefield 5 39 no data
Counter-Strike 2 43 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 13 no data
Far Cry 5 21 no data
Fortnite 47 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 11 no data
Battlefield 5 33 no data
Counter-Strike 2 19 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 48 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9 no data
Dota 2 51 no data
Far Cry 5 20 no data
Fortnite 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 28 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18 no data
Metro Exodus 16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9 no data
Dota 2 48 no data
Far Cry 5 19 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Valorant 37 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Metro Exodus 10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 no data
Far Cry 5 16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High

Atomic Heart 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10 no data
Metro Exodus 6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 18 no data
Far Cry 5 8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1785 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.