ATI FireGL X3-256 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking742not rated
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Power efficiency21.54no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeR420
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)3 August 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed300 MHz491 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt57 Watt
Texture fill rate40.005.892
Floating-point processing power2.048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared454 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data29.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 3 August 2004
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 57 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has an age advantage of 13 years, a 89% more advanced lithography process, and 74% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2009 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or FireGL X3-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.