Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs RX Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RX Vega 56 RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64 Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Liquid RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega Nano RX Vega XL RX Vega XT RX Vega XTX Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 64
2017, $499
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
33.06
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
2023, $309
10 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
45.27
+36.9%

6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms RX Vega 64 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.6188.85
Power efficiency8.7320.74
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (9 years ago)17 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 435% better value for money than RX Vega 64.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962304
Core clock speed1247 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate395.8352.8
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cache1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB10 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.1.1251.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 64 33.06
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 45.27
+36.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 13832
Samples: 3515
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 18941
+36.9%
Samples: 40

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116150−160
+29.3%
1440p77
−23%
100−110
4K5165−70
+27.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.302.06
+52.1%
1440p6.483.09
+52.3%
4K9.784.75
+51.4%
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 52% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 52% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 51% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 95−100 130−140
+31.3%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 250−260
+33%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+29.9%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 95−100 130−140
+31.3%
Battlefield 5 161 220−230
+36.6%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 250−260
+33%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+29.9%
Far Cry 5 110 150−160
+36.4%
Fortnite 150−160 200−210
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 167 220−230
+31.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 180−190
+33.3%
Valorant 315 400−450
+27%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 95−100 130−140
+31.3%
Battlefield 5 146 190−200
+30.1%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 250−260
+33%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 350−400
+26.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+29.9%
Dota 2 150 200−210
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 104 140−150
+34.6%
Far Cry 6 95−100 130−140
+34%
Fortnite 150−160 200−210
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 158 210−220
+32.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 150−160
+29.3%
Metro Exodus 73 95−100
+30.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 180−190
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132 180−190
+36.4%
Valorant 293 400−450
+36.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 139 190−200
+36.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 100−105
+29.9%
Dota 2 138 180−190
+30.4%
Far Cry 5 98 130−140
+32.7%
Forza Horizon 4 128 170−180
+32.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 180−190
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77 100−105
+29.9%
Valorant 140 190−200
+35.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 200−210
+33.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 110−120
+35.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 300−310
+27.7%
Far Cry 6 60−65 80−85
+31.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 90−95
+32.4%
Metro Exodus 46 60−65
+30.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 230−240
+31.4%
Valorant 263 350−400
+33.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 120−130
+34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 50−55
+35.1%
Far Cry 5 81 110−120
+35.8%
Forza Horizon 4 98 130−140
+32.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 80−85
+31.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 110−120
+26.4%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30 35−40
+29.6%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 50−55
+31.6%
Far Cry 6 24−27 30−33
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 95−100
+35.7%
Metro Exodus 46 60−65
+30.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 65−70
+35.4%
Valorant 205 280−290
+36.6%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 59 80−85
+35.6%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 50−55
+31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 21−24
+23.5%
Dota 2 96 130−140
+35.4%
Far Cry 5 44 60−65
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 66 90−95
+36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 55−60
+31%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 55−60
+34.1%

This is how RX Vega 64 and RX 6750 GRE 10 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 29% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 27% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.06 45.27
Recency 7 August 2017 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 170 Watt

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a 37% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 42% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 LE
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Pro 555 Radeon Pro 555
vs
GTX 960A GTX 960A
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
vs
P5000 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Max-Q
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
GTX 950M GTX 950M
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega 64 Nano
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
HD 8490 OEM HD 8490 OEM
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
RX 580 OEM RX 580 OEM
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
RTX 5090 Mobile RTX 5090 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 892 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.