Playstation 3 GPU 65nm vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking179not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.69no data
Power efficiency8.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10RSX-65nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (9 years ago)August 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1247 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate395.813.20
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs25624
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length279 mm325 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s20.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 1.3
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 58 Watt

RX Vega 64 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 GPU 65nm, on the other hand, has 409% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 and Playstation 3 GPU 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 891 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Playstation 3 GPU 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 or Playstation 3 GPU 65nm, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.