Radeon Pro SSG vs RX Vega 64 Nano
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 251 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.50 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.85 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | Fiji |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2017 (9 years ago) | 26 July 2016 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 1156 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1247 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 8,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 319.2 | 268.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 152 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 |
| HDMI | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2017 | 26 July 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 260 Watt |
RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Radeon Pro SSG. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro SSG is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
