Jetson TX1 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | GM20B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2017 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2015 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1156 MHz | 998 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1247 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 2,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 20 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 319.2 | 15.97 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.511 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 16 |
| TMUs | 256 | 16 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x4 |
| Length | 152 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 9.6 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1 |
| CUDA | - | 5.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2017 | 4 January 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 20 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 6 Watt |
RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
Jetson TX1, on the other hand, has 4067% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Jetson TX1. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop graphics card while Jetson TX1 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
