Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.00
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 August 2017 (9 years ago)6 June 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed1408 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1668 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)345 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate427.0262.4
Floating-point processing power13.66 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2017 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 345 Watt 130 Watt

Arc Pro A60 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 165% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and Arc Pro A60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 31 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling or Arc Pro A60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.