ATI Radeon X1300 vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Radeon X1300, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
5.68
+3957%

6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms X1300 by a whopping 3957% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6591507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.29no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameVega RenoirRV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)1 December 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed400 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data1.800
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20-0−1
1440p240−1
4K18-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Cyberpunk 2077 13 0−1
Palworld 14−16 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 22 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 34 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1
Far Cry 5 15 0−1
Fortnite 33 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Palworld 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
Valorant 97
+4750%
2−3
−4750%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Cyberpunk 2077 7 0−1
Dota 2 42
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Fortnite 22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Metro Exodus 8 0−1
Palworld 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 0−1
Valorant 73
+7200%
1−2
−7200%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 19 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8 0−1
Dota 2 40 0−1
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11 0−1
Valorant 19 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 0−1
Palworld 14−16 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Valorant 49
+4800%
1−2
−4800%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Palworld 8−9 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Valorant 22 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 19 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 0−1
Palworld 1−2 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.68 0.14
Recency 7 January 2020 1 December 2005
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 3957% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 873 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Radeon X1300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.