GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 56
2017, $399
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
30.80

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms RX Vega 56 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21159
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.7876.81
Power efficiency11.4526.30
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (9 years ago)18 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4060 Ti has 332% better value for money than RX Vega 56.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844352
Core clock speed1156 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speed1471 MHz2535 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate329.5344.8
Floating-point processing power10.54 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs224136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cache896 KB4.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 56 30.80
RTX 4060 Ti 53.91
+75%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 56 12910
Samples: 3777
RTX 4060 Ti 22598
+75%
Samples: 16255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115200−210
+73.9%
1440p77
−40.8%
130−140
4K5085−90
+70%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.472.00
+42.5%
1440p5.183.07
+40.8%
4K7.984.69
+41.2%
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 43% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 41% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti has 41% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180 300−310
+70.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 120−130
+69%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 120−130
+71.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75−80 130−140
+64.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 151 260−270
+72.2%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 300−310
+70.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 120−130
+69%
Far Cry 5 98 170−180
+73.5%
Fortnite 150 260−270
+73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 141 240−250
+70.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 120−130
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 153 260−270
+69.9%
Valorant 190−200 300−310
+50.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140 240−250
+71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 300−310
+70.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 450−500
+63%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 120−130
+69%
Dota 2 130−140 230−240
+69.1%
Far Cry 5 93 160−170
+72%
Fortnite 139 240−250
+72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 134 230−240
+71.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 94 160−170
+70.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 120−130
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 70 120−130
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 137 230−240
+67.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 124 210−220
+69.4%
Valorant 190−200 300−310
+50.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 131 220−230
+67.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 120−130
+69%
Dota 2 130−140 230−240
+69.1%
Far Cry 5 89 150−160
+68.5%
Forza Horizon 4 109 190−200
+74.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75 120−130
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120 210−220
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 120−130
+62.2%
Valorant 190−200 300−310
+50.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 108 180−190
+66.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 120−130
+62.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 350−400
+59.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65 100−105
+61.3%
Metro Exodus 42 70−75
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 300−310
+71.4%
Valorant 230−240 400−450
+73.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 99 170−180
+71.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 55−60
+61.8%
Far Cry 5 74 120−130
+62.2%
Forza Horizon 4 88 150−160
+70.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 60−65
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 95−100
+72.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 74 120−130
+62.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 55−60
+61.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 50 85−90
+70%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 35−40
+75%
Metro Exodus 27 45−50
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 75−80
+70.5%
Valorant 180−190 300−310
+60.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55 95−100
+72.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 24−27
+60%
Dota 2 95−100 160−170
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 39 65−70
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 59 100−105
+69.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 35−40
+75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44 75−80
+70.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 37 60−65
+62.2%

This is how RX Vega 56 and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 74% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 69% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 70% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.80 53.91
Recency 14 August 2017 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 160 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 64% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 56 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1032 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13268 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.