RTX A4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated86
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.68
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GA104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2018 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35846144
Core clock speed1138 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate291.4299.5
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs224192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache896 KB6 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 140 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has 17% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and RTX A4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 723 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.