Matrox Millennium G400 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameVega 10Toucan
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2018 (8 years ago)20 May 1999 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1138 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate291.40.25
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs2242
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 20 May 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and Matrox Millennium G400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Millennium G400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile or Matrox Millennium G400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.