GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega 10C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2018 (8 years ago)6 May 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358416
Core clock speed1138 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate291.44.000
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2248
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.