Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking863not rated
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Power efficiency14.24no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code namePicassoGS-250nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 November 2019 (6 years ago)4 March 2000 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz147 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million54 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt79 Watt
Texture fill rate13.201.176
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Lengthno data302 mm
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedeDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2560 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 November 2019 4 March 2000
Chip lithography 12 nm 250 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 79 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 1983% more advanced lithography process, and 427% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2296 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or Sony Playstation 2 GPU 250nm, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.